Bordeaux Musée des Beaux-Arts. Part 2. The Bonheur Wing.

The Bonheur Wing, Musée des Beaux-Arts, Bordeaux.

Behind the Palais Rohan, the seat of the City of Bordeaux whose gardens it shares, the Museum of Fine Arts offers a panorama of the main currents of Western art from the Renaissance to the present day. It occupies two twin wings added to the Palais Rohan in 1851 and opposite, the Galerie des Beaux-Arts completes its permanent collections by regularly hosting temporary exhibitions.

The north wing (Bonheur Wing) is dedicated to modern and contemporary art, presenting the main themes of the 19th Century (romanticism, academicism, and realism), landscapes (Corot, Diaz de la Peña, Boudin), animal paintings (Rosa Bonheur, René Princeteau) and portraits (Thomas Couture, Carolus-Duran, Fantin-Latour and Berthe Morisot).

As the wing of the museum was named to honour the Bordeaux-born artist, Rosa Bonheur, the first couple of paintings in the Bonheur wing of the museum I am showing you are by her or about her.

Rosa Bonheur in her studio by George-Achille Fould (1893)

As the wing of the museum was named to honour the Bordeaux-born artist, Rosa Bonheur, the first couple of paintings in the Bonheur wing of the museum I am showing you are by her or about her.    Rosa Bonheur was born in Bordeaux on March 16th 1822.  She was known best as a painter of animals (animalière). She also made sculptures in a realist style.

This portrait of Bonheur in her studio was painted by Georges Achille-Fould.  In the painting we can see a detail taken from her monumental painting, Wheat Threshing in the Camargue.  Bonheur can be seen wearing trousers which were forbidden at that time for women. However, Bonheur argued for authorisation from the prefecture to wear them during her drawing sessions at the slaughterhouses!   She was passionate about animals, and owned a whole menagerie, including a lion, quails, dogs and even some sheep.   For her contemporaries, Rosa Bonheur was truly a phenomenon! Her talent was recognized in 1865 when she became the first female artist to be awarded the Legion of Honour.

Georges Achille-Fould en japonaise, portrait by Léon Comerre (1863)

The artist who completed this portrait of Bonheur was Georges Achille-Fould. Georges Achille-Fould and her sister Consuelo, both painters, were adopted by Gheorghe Bibescu, who bequeathed to them the Chateau de Bécon, which today houses the Roybet Fould Museum, where numerous works by Consuelo and Fernand Roybet, her tutor, are displayed, alongside many works attributed to Achille-Fould, who signed them simply “Achille-Fould”.

Wheat Threshing in the Camargue by Rosa Bonheur

Rosa Bonheur started on her largest painting, (313 x 651 cm), Wheat Threshing in the Camargue, in 1864 but on her death in 1899, thirty-five years later, it remained unfinished. This is oil on canvas work is the largest format ever painted by the artist and is a genre scene depicting a dozen horses treading wheat in the Camargue. It is said that Rosa’s ideas for the depiction came from her reading the Mirèio, a long poem consisting of twelve songs by French writer Frédéric Mistral, written in 1859 after eight years of effort. It tells of the thwarted love of Vincent and Mireille, two young Provençal people of different social backgrounds.   It was a story about a miserly farmer who made his horses work tirelessly at fulling and who was punished by lightning that set fire to his barn and an earthquake that engulfed his family. In her work, Rosa Bonheur wanted to show “the fire that comes out of the horses’ nostrils, the dust that gushes out under their hooves

Rolla by Henri Gervex (1878)

Now to a completely different type of painting.  Rolla was a painting completed by Henri Gervex and is at the museum but on loan from the Musée d’Orsay, Paris.  Gervex was a French painter and was the son of Joséphine Peltier and Félix Nicolas Gervex, a piano maker. When he was 15, a friend of the family helped him get admitted to the atelier of Pierre-Nicolas Brisset. Three years later, he served in the 152nd Battalion of the National Guard. In 1871, aged 19, he was accepted into the École des Beaux-Arts in the studio of Alexandre Cabanel, where he studied for five years. His early work belonged almost exclusively to the mythological genre, which served as an excuse for the painting of the nude, but not always in the best of taste.  He had already been awarded a medal at the Salon, which in theory made him an “outsider” in terms of the competition and therefore any painting he put forward to be included at the Salon was guaranteed inclusion into future exhibitions without having to satisfy the Salon jurists.  It therefore came as a shock to him to have his painting, Rolla, for the upcoming 1878 Salon, rejected as the authorities deemed the depiction of his painting Rolla to be “immoral”.

The inspiration for Gerex’s painting came from a long poem by Alfred de Musset entitled Rolla which he completed in 1833.  The long poem narrates the story and the destiny of a young bourgeois, Jacques Rolla, who descends into a life of idleness and debauchery. Along the way, he meets Marion, a teenager who has discovered that the life of a prostitute was her only escape from misery. In the painting we see Rolla standing by the window, his eyes turned towards Marion who lies abandoned on the bed. He is desolate and about to commit suicide by taking poison.

Gervex found his inspiration in a long poem by Alfred de Musset (1810-1857), published in 1833. The text recounts

With a melancholy eye Rolla gazed on

The beautiful Marion asleep in her wide bed;

In spite of himself, an unnameable and diabolical horror

Made him tremble to the bone.

Marion had cost dearly. — To pay for his night

He had spent his last coins.

His friends knew it. And he, on arriving,

Had taken their hand and given his word that

In the morning no one would see him alive.

When Rolla saw the sun appear on the roofs,

He went and leaned out the window.

Rolla turned to look at Marie.

She felt exhausted, and had fallen asleep.

And thus both fled the cruelties of fate,

The child in sleep, and the man in death!

So why did the Beaux Arts authorities ban the painting?  If the scene had been judged indecent, surely it was not because of Marion’s nudity, which is not unlike the portrayal of nudes by many artists of the time. It appears that the underwear strewn besides the bed denotes Marion’s consent in the sex act and hints at her status as a prostitute. Look at the abandoned clothing and we see a walking stick emerging from the midst of the garments which many believe acts as a metaphor for sexual intercourse.

Following Gervex’s painting Rolla being excluded from the Salon, he exhibited it for three months in the gallery of a Parisian art dealer. The scandal, which was covered in all the newspapers, attracted large crowds to the gallery. In an interview many years later, which was published in 1924, Gervex remembered the pleasure when he witnessed the constant procession of visitors who queued to see the work. Many cynics believed that Gervex had anticipated the reaction to his painting by the authorities and gladly provoked the scandal.

The Lion Hunt by Eugène Delacroix (1855)

In 1855, Delacroix was commissioned by the French State and Napoleon III to produce a monumental work for the that year’s Paris Universal Exposition.  Delacroix had studied Rubens’ hunting scenes and was fascinated by the theme of lions. Delacroix often painted hunting scenes and animals fighting. This work is part of a lion hunt series he painted in the 1850s. The subject reflects a fascination for exoticism and the culture of the Muslim countries in North Africa. During a visit to Morocco in the 1830s, Delacroix had studied and made sketches of the landscape, horses and hunters on horseback – themes that were later used when he painted his lion hunts. These dramatic scenes, with their energetic compositions and warm hues, convey the new aesthetic ideals of the time.

The dimensions of his painting, The Lion Hunt, was monumental at 175 x 360cms.  Delacroix had spent much time at the Ménagerie part of the Jardin des Plantes in Paris. These regular visits allowed him to capture not just the ferocity of the cats and their musculature, but also the colour of their fur which allowed him to develop a more authentic form of animal paintings.

The Tiger Hunt by Rubens (1618)

When Delacroix had completed the painting in 1855 it was deposited at the Museum of Fine Arts of Bordeaux, the city where the painter once lived as a young man when his father was prefect there. Bordeaux was also a city Delacroix occasionally came to pay his respects at the Chartreuse Cemetery, where his father and brother were buried.   Bordeaux was also the city in which Peter Paul Rubens had his painting, The Tiger Hunt displayed and which the Bordeaux museum had been exhibiting since 1805, and which is believed to have been a strong influence on Delacroix.  

The deputy director and curator in charge of 19th/20th-century collections at the museum, Chloé Theault, believed that the two works would complement each other.  The first thing that catches your eye when you study Delacroix’s work is it appears that the top of the painting is missing. In fact, the upper third of it no longer exists, as on December 7th, 1870, a fire ravaged through the town hall in Bordeaux destroying part of the work.  The entire upper part of the painting disappeared into the ashes.

The Lion Hunt by Odile Redon (1860-1870)

Today, some sketches and copies, and notably one by Odilon Redon, exists which allow us to imagine what the upper third of Delacroix’s painting would have looked like with the two missing horse riders that were once in the upper section.

The Heirs by Eugène Buland (1887)

Eugène Buland was born on October 26th, 1852.  He was the son of an engraver and entered the École Nationale Supérieure des Beaux-Arts under the tutelage of Alexandre Cabanel. His earliest works were Symbolist paintings of antique scenes, but he quickly turned towards depicting scenes of everyday life.  Eugène Buland entered just one painting, The Heirs, at the Salon in 1887 which gained him a second-place medal.  It depicts his predilection for subjects taken from daily life in the countryside. 

In this figurative work, Buland concentrates on a study of provincial behaviour, conveying the peaceful, quiet lifestyle and the impression of time almost standing still.   In the same way as the French writer, Maupassant, Buland tells short stories, novels in his depictions. The strange ambiguity of the scene here is striking. The tight framing of the scene strengthens the almost oppressive atmosphere of this private meeting in which the stone-faced characters, deep in their own thoughts, wait for the will to be read.  The touches of red contrast with the dark austere colours and direct our eye towards the open safe, seals, the official banner and finally the will, the focus of everyone’s attention.

Freeing himself from the teachings of his master Alexandre Cabanel, Buland became influenced in naturalism. He was concerned with the detail and drawing inspired by photographic precision which made him a rare artist and a hyperrealist ahead of his time. 

The Day of the Dead by William Bouguereau (1859)

The last selection I am offering you from the Bonheur Gallery of the Bordeaux Musée des Beaux Arts is, like the previous painting, a quietly sombre depiction.  There is none of the excitement depicted in the previous seascapes or the savagery of a lion hunt.

The painting entitled The Day of the Dead is by the French academic painter William Bouguereau which he completed in 1859.  Bouguereau was born in La Rochelle on November 30th 1825.  During his life, he enjoyed significant popularity in France and the United States, was given numerous official honours, and received top prices for his work

The painting The Day of the Dead, depicts a mother and daughter mourning the loss of a husband and father as they kneel at the foot of a tomb.   The work captures the essence of the Mexican tradition of Día de Muertos.  It is a depiction of death with the black of the mourning clothes, which are illuminated by the luminous yellow of the wreath of immortelles, the cross and winter itself.  Bouguereau creates a painting full of restraint, serious and dignified, one of remarkable beauty. With restraint of feelings, the theme conveys an exaltation of the traditional values of the classical cultural ideal and the Christian faith.

The painting was exhibited at the Salon of 1859, this work was the subject of many glowing reviews.

Bordeaux Musée des Beaux Arts. Part 1. The Lacour Wing.

Last week I spent a few days in the French city of Bordeaux and besides visiting must-see museums such as Cité du Vin, Musée d’Aquitaine, the cathedral and sampled the red wine and French cooking, I spent half a day looking around the Musée des Beaux Arts which had an excellent selection of paintings. The Musée des Beaux Arts Bordeaux is the oldest of Bordeaux’s museums and was founded in 1801 under the guidance of painter Pierre Lacour. This establishment ranks among the most significant art galleries in France beyond the confines of Paris.

Lacour wing of the Musée des Beaux Arts, Bordeaux

Bonheur Wing of the Musée des Beaux Arts, Bordeaux

The museum is located in the heart of Bordeaux, next to the town hall gardens.  It is a veritable treasure trove of art and history, offering an exceptional selection of European painting and sculpture from the 15th to the 20th century. The museum consists of two buildings, housed in the north and south wings of the Palais Rohan, the current town hall.  Its extensive permanent collection features major works by Flemish, Dutch, Italian, and French artists. Highlights include paintings by Peter Paul Rubens, Jean-Baptiste Chardin, Eugène Delacroix, and Odilon Redon, offering a journey through various artistic movements. The museum is not limited to old masters. It also has a fine selection of works from the 19th and early 20th centuries, reflecting the artistic developments of these periods.

In this first of two blogs I want to look at some of the works which were on show in the south wing of the museum, The Lacour Wing.

In the Lacour Wing the permanent exhibition starts with Renaissance art from Italy and Northern Europe in the 15th and 16th centuries with Titian amongst the paintings. The 17th century exhibition includes Baroque art with works of Paul Rubens and a section of Dutch painters including Jan van Goyen.  Finally, in this wing there is an exhibition of 18th century paintings including a painting of the port and quais of Bordeaux by the building’s namesake, Pierre Lacour.

The view of the Chartrons and Bacalan Harbour and Waterfront Area in Bordeaux by Pierre Lacour Snr. (1804-1806)

The Port de la Lune, Bordeaux’s port since the Middle Ages, takes its name from the crescent-shaped bend of the Garonne on which the city was built. Since the 17th century, this panoramic view has been a favourite subject for artists from Bordeaux and beyond. Originally from Bordeaux, Pierre Lacour Snr. is one of the tutelary figures of the Musée des Beaux-Arts, a French painter and lithographer known for his views of the city and its surroundings. A professor and then director of the Academy of Painting, Lacour trained many generations of artists. Between 1804 and 1806, Pierre Lacour, the museum’s first curator, captured this urban landscape in his own vision of Bordeaux. The depiction takes in the view that depicts the facades of the Chartrons and Bacalan.

The Artist Painting a Family Portrait by Pierre Lacour Snr. (1798)

The Chartrons dates back to the 14th century when the Carthusian monks,  the “Chartreux” in French, settled here giving the district its name. By the 17th century, the area had become the headquarters of Bordeaux’s booming wine trade.  The Bacalan is the northern part of the city built around the port.  For me, the joy of the painting is its focus on the smallest detailing of the human activities in this lively district.   As day comes to an end, we see carters and their teams loaded with stones, also carriages and cabriolets.  Shipwrights maintain the hulls of the canoes. In the background, a porter is unloading a cargo of stave wood used to create wine barrels. Further on, a carter is trying to pull up his team, loaded with stones, with his whip, while, further back, barrels are rolled on the ground from a barge, then pulled by means of ropes towards the warehouses.  The work highlights all the socio-professional categories at the origin of the city’s economic prosperity: merchants, craftsmen, and boatmen. An impressive fleet of canoes and skiffs sailed around the tall ships that came to trade.

The young girl in the left foreground carrying a parasol is the painter’s daughter, and the man to whom she is addressing is Pierre Lacour himself. Leaning over the fence next to them is Pierre Lacour Jr.

Portrait, said to be of Aubin Vouet by Simon Vouet (c. 1620), Arles, musée Réattu

Aubin Vouet was a French painter, the son of Laurent Vouet and younger brother of Simon Vouet, both also painters. Aubin joined his brother Simon in Rome six years after his eldest brother had moved there. They were there together around 1619-1620 and they both lodged on Vicolo di San Silvestro. In Rome Aubin was strongly influenced by Caravaggio, as can be seen in this painting David Holding Goliath’s Head, and this influence labelled him as one of the Caravaggisti.  Aubin returned to France, whereas his brother stayed in Rome a further six years until 1627. In 1621, on his return to France, Aubin was made painter in ordinary to Louis XIII.

David holding the head of Goliath by Aubin Vouet (c.1620)

The battle between the Philistine giant Goliath and the young Jewish shepherd David, recorded in the Old Testament, ended the war that divided these two peoples as described in the First Book of Samuel, XVII, 48-54:

“…As the Philistine moved closer to attack him, David ran quickly toward the battle line to meet him. Reaching into his bag and taking out a stone, he slung it and struck the Philistine on the forehead. The stone sank into his forehead, and he fell face down on the ground.  So, David triumphed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone; without a sword in his hand, he struck down the Philistine and killed him.  David ran and stood over him. He took hold of the Philistine’s sword and drew it from the sheath. After he killed him, he cut off his head with the sword.  When the Philistines saw that their hero was dead, they turned and ran.  Then the men of Israel and Judah surged forward with a shout and pursued the Philistines to the entrance of Gath[f] and to the gates of Ekron. Their dead were strewn along the Shaaraim road to Gath and Ekron.  When the Israelites returned from chasing the Philistines, they plundered their camp.  David took the Philistine’s head and brought it to Jerusalem; he put the Philistine’s weapons in his own tent…”

Driven by his faith, David – often referred to as a “child,” “young,” and “handsome” defeated Goliath, a seasoned warrior, through trickery. Armed only with his slingshot, he knocked out his enemy with a stone and then took his sword to cut off his head.   This biblical tale was favoured by many artists of the early seventeenth century such as Caravaggio and his emulators Domenico Feti, Artemisia Gentileschi, Bartolomeo Manfredi, Nicolas Régnier or Valentin de Boulogne. The theme depicted in this painting was favoured by artists during the first third of the 17the century. They all had a real liking for this biblical episode, the conclusion of the fight made it possible to represent the revulsion of death.

It is thought that Aubin Vouet was seduced by the violence of the Caravaggio masterpieces he had seen in Rome.  In this work he chose to characterise David as the victorious hero, with his eyes lowered and his pout disdainful. The way in which Vouet has depicted youthful nudity is believed to be inspired not only by Florentine Renaissance sculpture but also by Caravaggio’s depictions of adolescents, and it cleverly contrasts the young man’s virile features with Goliath’s imposing head. The young David’s body is highlighted by the framing of two-thirds of the body, represented in a clever chiaroscuro. The elegance of the hat braided in gold and adorned with an ostrich feather adds a touch of refinement to David.

The Oak Struck by Lightning or The Fortune Teller by Jan Josephsz van Goyen (1638)

I have often written about my love of Dutch Golden Age paintings so it would be remiss of me not to include an example of work from this period. Jan Josephsz. van Goyen was one of the main pioneers of naturalistic landscape in early 17th-century Holland. His many drawings show that he travelled extensively in Holland and beyond. In 1634 he is recorded painting in Haarlem, in the house of Isaac, the brother of Salomon van Ruysdael, who was another of the pioneers of realistic landscape painting in the north Netherlands.  Van Goyen was born at Leiden, and trained in Haarlem with Esaias van de Velde. After returning to Leiden he moved to The Hague in 1631, where he chiefly worked until his death. His earliest dated painting is from 1620.  His daughter married his pupil Jan Steen, the famous painter of genre scenes, in 1649.

This painting, The Oak Struck by Lightning also known as The Fortune Teller,  is one of the Dutch painter Jan Josephsz van Goyen’s masterpieces. The work is typical of the quasi-monochrome style van Goyen had developed between 1633 and 1644 in The Hague, after initially training in Haarlem.  Before us we see a highly detailed view of a tree, which had been struck by lightening,. The depiction then opens out into an extensive panorama under a threatening dark sky which looms above this tree. The range of colours used by the artist is reduced down to simple shades of yellow and grey and changes towards a monochrome palette. In front of the tree, we see a bohemian-looking figure reading the palm of a villager.  

On the left of the painting, we see a well-dressed gentleman walking his dogs.  This is a self-portrait of van Goyen !

The owl

The Palm Reader

However, this is not simply a picturesque landscape scene.  It is in fact an allegorical one.  Van Goyen was a devout Christian who wanted to add a narrative to his painting.  We need to look closely at some of the details to discover what van Goyen was “saying”.   The red of the man’s beret symbolizes his inability to ignore superstition. The owl, perched in full daylight on a bare, dead branch of the oak tree, represents man’s blindness to chiromancy, the supposed prediction of a person’s future from interpreting the lines on the palms of their hands, in other words, palmistry which was a practice forbidden by the Church. Finally, the lightening evokes divine punishment. 

The Ploughing Lesson or The Agriculture Lesson or Agriculture by François-André Vincent

The next painting from the Lacour Wing of the museum which I am showcasing is The Ploughing Lesson by François-André Vincent, a French neoclassical painter.    He was the son of the miniaturist François-Elie Vincent and studied under Joseph-Marie Vien.  François-André Vincent was a pupil of École Royale des Éleves Protégés. From 1771 to 1775 he studied at the French Academy in Rome.

Germanicus Calms Sedition in his Camp by François-André Vincent (1768) Beaux-Arts Paris

He travelled to Rome after winning the Prix de Rome with his painting, Germanicus Calms Sedition in his Camp, in 1768, and it was then that he was installed at the Palais Mancini, where he painted numerous portraits, inspired by Jean-Honoré Fragonard’s style, who also was visiting Rome and Naples at the same time.  He was a leader of the neoclassical and historical movement in French art, along with his rival Jacques-Louis David, another pupil of Vien. He was influenced by the art of classical antiquity, by the masters of the Italian High Renaissance, especially Raphael. François-André Vincent was one of the principal innovators of the subjects and themes in French art of Neoclassical style and his works were of a high standard.

The Ploughing Lesson, a genre painting completed in 1798, also features a series of portrait paintings as members of a wealthy family observe their son’s lesson in ploughing, aligning with the belief that a knowledge of agriculture was of vital importance following the French Revolution. In the background we have depicted the Pyrenees mountains.  The painting was commissioned by the industrialist, financier and politician from Bordeaux and Toulouse, François-Bernard Boyer-Fonfrède. He was also an important patron of the arts who ran a cotton mill in Toulouse as well as a “Free School of Industry” for children from poor families who worked in the factory.  The painting was intended to be part of a series, illustrating the virtues and the foundations of a good education.  The painting was meant to depict that work in the fields was a noble occupation for children.  This bringing together of the bourgeoise and the peasant suggests an idyllic alliance of two opposing social classes.

The painting depicts a strong-bodied farmer explaining to his pupil, a boy from a good family with fine features, how to hold the plough as it is pulled by a pair of oxen.  Witnessing this lesson is the young man’s family. The painting was shown at the 1798 Paris Salon and was accompanied by a vignette:

“…Penetrated by the truth that agriculture is the basis of the prosperity of States, the painter has represented a father of a family who, accompanied by his wife and young daughter, comes to visit a ploughman in the middle of his work. He pays homage to him by attending the lesson he has asked him to give to his son, whose education he would consider imperfect without this knowledge. Note – Commerce and other interesting parts of education must form a sequel to this first table which, as well as this suite, are intended for citizen Boyer-Fonfrède, of Toulouse…”

Some art critics criticised the posture of the novice as being unseemly because the boy’s head is hidden, when by convention it should be turned towards the viewer.

The painting was acquired by the Musée des Beaux-Arts in Bordeaux in 1830.

……to be continued